![]() ![]() In Windows I’ll probably use the original KeePass. On my Linux machines I think I might switch from X to XC, but I’ll test XC a few weeks first and look for bugs before the switch. But on Linux the GUI isn’t appealing, has bugs and requires mono so X and XC are better there in my opinion. The original KeePass for Windows/.Net has more functionality and is probably more secure in Windows than both KeePassX and KeePassXC and works great on Win7, 8.x and 10.Net lowers the risk for security related bugs created by programmers compared to C++. I don’t know, but it should’ve been put in an optional plugin not in the main program. Only disadvantage I could find was that it has a function to talk with web browsers through plugins which I don’t think I will use and therefore offers no advantage to me but might possibly be a security threat if accidentally left on in settings. I can’t say anything about security or how many hidden bugs it has, but the GUI is much better than KeePassX which has had unfixed GUI-bugs for a few years. OS X and Windows users might prefer KeePassXC over KeePassX as autotype works there: KeePassXC is for people with extremely high demands of secure personal data management. ![]() You can run KeePassXC on Windows, macOS, and Linux systems. I tested KeePassXC for the first time today on Linux. KeePassXC is a modern, secure, and open-source password manager that stores and manages your most sensitive information.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |